Aníbal Fernández's arguments for the validity of the DNU on Vicentin

Image: Wikipedia

---

The controller of Yacimientos Carboniferos Río Turbio (YCRT), Aníbal Fernández , defended the presidential decision to intervene the company Vicentin . Through a Twitter thread, the former Chief of Staff listed the reasons why the DNU that decrees the intervention is valid. Commercial law in the Argentine Republic is applied by provincial or national judges a provincial judge cannot rule on a federal act begins the publication on their social networks alluding to the ruling of magistrate Fabián Lorenzini who agreed to reinstate the administration of the company to its executives for a period of 60 days and granted the role of inspectors to the auditors appointed by the Executive Power.

Fernández said, the distinction between federal and ordinary (local) jurisdiction is based on the federal system adopted by the National Constitution. That regime adopted by our Magna Carta gives rise to the existence of a double court order in the Argentine Republic

In response to the criticism of the journalist Diego Cabot for the decision of the president, Alberto Fernández , the former Chief of Staff cited Article 121 of the National Constitution, which establishes that the provinces retain all power not delegated by this Constitution to the Government federal and expressly reserved by special pacts at the time of their incorporation.

Fernández replied to Cabot, Perhaps you have been overlooked that Law 48 (the same that regulates the extraordinary resource) establishes the cases that correspond to the federal justice system listing:

a) cases specially governed by the CN

b) causes specially governed by laws of the National Congress and which are not included in the matters that correspond to the civil, commercial, criminal, mining, labor and social security codes

c) causes specially governed by the treaties with foreign nations

d) causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction.

The inspector from Río Turbio concluded, please, to debate with the president, the less you read a little manual on constitutional law. To think that they have prizes for journalistic investigation and don't give them the gasoline to read a manual.